Recent Discussions in CMMi Process Improvement


To join this group, send a blank email to cmmi_process_improvement-subscribe@yahoogroups.com or visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cmmi_process_improvement



  1. Re: Is walkthrough a validation technique?
    Andre, You disappointed me. I was thinking you were the only one (other than me:) who really understood what VAL is all about, but you too reduced VAL into...
    - Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:39:24 GMT
  2. QPM Subprocess
    HI, I read a long discussion about the number of subprocess to monitor in QPM, and it seems to be that "It Depends" was the mayor conclusion. But something...
    - Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:38:35 GMT
  3. Re: Regarding Keeping CMMI tag after expiry in email signature and c
    Can anybody reply for below... ... on...
    - Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:38:30 GMT
  4. Re: Is walkthrough a validation technique?
    As long as that “End Customer” is the end-customer for the work product being validated, not necessarily (or only) the end-customer for the “end ...
    - Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:37:55 GMT
  5. Re: Is walkthrough a validation technique?
    Hello all, Very interesting conversation. Personally, I think a code walk through can be only a verification technique having to do with peer review. I think...
    - Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:37:37 GMT
  6. Re: Is walkthrough a validation technique?
    Pat, In your message below, you just disregard the intended environment part of VAL and reduced the VAL into involvement of customer/end user/or their...
    - Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:37:05 GMT
  7. Re: Is walkthrough a validation technique?
    If it is performed with the (end) customer, with the intention to capture the intention of the customer, then yes, in my view. Andre. Groet, Gruß, Regards, ...
    - Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:12:57 GMT
  8. Fwd: [CMMi Process Improvement] Re: A query on VALIDATION
    Great, then we agree again! Regards, Andre. ... Great, then we agree again! Regards, Andre. On 20 nov 2008, at 02:44, Rob Leinen wrote: Andre, I don't think I...
    - Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:39:59 GMT
  9. Re: A query on VALIDATION
    There are many interpretations of VAL. However, in our CMMI work we can only assess against the SEI/CMMI definition. I don't know Juran's model, so I can't...
    - Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:39:38 GMT
  10. Re: Is walkthrough a validation technique?
    Pat, I couldn't agree more. My example was intended to demonstrate that VER and VAL sometimes look and feel similar, and specifically that a "review" is not...
    - Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:15:07 GMT
  11. Re: A query on VALIDATION
    Pat, That was you? Wow, who knew? (8> Regards, Rob L. ... credit for inventing CAPITAL and lowercase letters. Perhaps I am revealing something about my age...
    - Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:51:42 GMT
  12. Re: A query on VALIDATION
    Rob, As long as we're handing out credit, I would like to take full credit for inventing CAPITAL and lowercase letters. Perhaps I am revealing something about...
    - Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:41:17 GMT
  13. Re: Is walkthrough a validation technique?
    Jeff, I don't perceive activities falling cleanly into verification OR validation; sometimes it has both (in varying degrees, perhaps, but both nonetheless). ...
    - Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:40:51 GMT
  14. Re: Is walkthrough a validation technique?
    It's an interesting question.  Is a walkthrough a "peer review?"  Just because the CMMI says peer reviews are part of VER, does that mean one can't be VAL? ...
    - Thu, 20 Nov 2008 06:08:30 GMT
  15. Re: Is walkthrough a validation technique?
    Could you please give an example for appropriate criteria so that it can be considered as a validation? Thanks Orhan Toronto ...
    - Thu, 20 Nov 2008 06:08:28 GMT